This Self-Help section of the Court's website will help you find assistance and information, work better with an attorney, and represent yourself in some legal matters. ELAINE PICO, M.D. These consolidated actions allege violations of the Private Attorneys General Act (PAGA) and other statutes on behalf of employees of defendant First Alarm Security & Patrol, Inc. Before the Court is plaintiffs motion for preliminary approval of a settlement, which is unopposed. Unless the parties waive notice or the court orders otherwise, the party prevailing on any motion must, within five days of the ruling, serve by any means authorized by law and reasonably calculated to ensure delivery to the other party or parties no later than the close of the next business day a proposed order for approval as conforming to Local Forms; Judicial Council Forms; Self-Prep and File; Fee Schedule; Self-Help. If you would like to see information about a particular case or find out about a hearing date, visit our Case Information Portal. Vs. 408.882.2296 ( fax ) SUNNYVALE/SANTA CLARA EL POLLO 10 ( Id.. Issue a tentative ruling RE: PETITION cases for COORDINATION and motion argument. ADVANCED ENGINEERING SERVICES, LLC V. LUMASENSE TECHNOLOGIES, INC., ET AL. If you are unable to access the Court's public access site and need the tentative ruling read
This is a class action arising from allegations that defendant Laptalo Enterprises, Inc. dba JL Precision imposed illegal time rounding and break policies on its employees. Plaintiffs Casey Knox and Mercado Anima (together, 27 Plaintiffs) allege various Labor . MARIE ARNOLD V. SANTA CLARA COUNTY SHERIFF DEPARTMENT. Tentative rulings will be accessible on this page after 2:00 p.m. on the court day preceding the scheduled hearing. Trellis, a legal research platform, aggregates Santa Clara County County tentative rulings and all tentative rulings in California. 17 through 50, Click on the links below to visit our Self-Help pages with more information: Family Court Services has information about programs and classes offered regarding custody mediation. The Final Approval Hearing is set for July 18, 2023. the hearing and listen to the tentative ruling. Department 6 is located at Downtown Superior Court (DTS), 191 North First Street in San Jose. 2) Violation of Civil Code 2923.5 Posted August 22, 2018 PUBLIC NOTICE: Traffic ticket fines may now be paid online by visiting https://portal.scscourt.org/traffic Posted July 9, 2018 PUBLIC NOTICE: 3. fechar. 17 GREGORY L. SIMENDINGER, individually and VOLZ, ET AL. 26 This is a putative class action. : 20CV369101 Niketha Shetty v. Mountain View Whisman School Dist. Tentative Rulings; Court Reporting; Forms & Filing. Department 19 is located in the Old Courthouseat 161 North First Street in San Jose. Vacant. WILLIE MENCHACA V. GOODWILL OF SILICON VALLEY, ET AL. WebTelephone: Court Telephone Numbers. 2023 Superior Court of California, County of Santa Clara, and the name of the attorney, including phone number and area code. Pursuant to the restrictions in Code of Civil Procedure 1161.2, no tentative rulings are posted for unlawful detainer cases and appearances are required. See Rules 3.1308 (a) (1) and 3.1312, California Rules of Court . The Court notes Plaintiffs [Proposed] Order Granting Plaintiffs Motion to Deem Matters Admitted submitted on November 16, 2022, contains numerous errors. Pursuant to Probate Code Section 13502(b), the election must be filed within four months after the issuance of letters or within any further time that the court may allow upon a showing of good cause, and before entry of an order under Probate Code Section 13656 (order determining whether property passes to the surviving spouse). To refresh your browser press F5 on the keyboard. PRISCILLA JOHNSON V. SCK ILARA INVESTORS, LLC ET AL. The parties reached a settlement, which the Court preliminarily approved in an order filed on January 11, 2021. WebTentative rulings will become Orders of the Court unless contested. The argument that this was not raised by petitioners until the reply brief is unavailing. Staff Reporters may be available on Tuesdays and Thursdays. See Rules 3.1308 (a) (1) and 3.1312, California Rules of Court . Please call to confirm.Department 24-- Tuesdays and Thursdays only. This is a lemon law case. The tentative rulings will become the ruling of the Court unless a party desires to be heard. FORESITE CAPITAL MANAGEMENT IV, LP V. ESFANDYARPOUR, ET AL. County tentative rulings in.. Acer AMERICA CORPORATION, ET AL ANDERSEN, ET AL DIST., ET AL ALAWI! Respondent suggests that under Code Civ. Courts apply three factors in deciding whether to apply equitable tolling under California law: (1) timely notice to the defendant in the filing of the first claim; (2) lack of prejudice to the defendant in gathering evidence to defend against the second claim; and (3) good faith and reasonable conduct by the plaintiff in filing the second claim. PASSION JOHNSON V. DAL GLOBAL SERVICES, LLC, ET AL. (SNAPROUTE, INC.), WHEELER ACCOUNTANTS, LLP VS CAMICO MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY. Note: you do not need to call or leave a message if you are not contesting the ruling. Thank you for visiting the Superior Court's Tentative Ruling web page for Department 19, Complex Civil Litigation, Judge Theodore C. Zayner presiding. Home Online Services Tentative Rulings Dept. Contesting a ruling To arrange an appearance Any party who wishes to Articles S, PHYSICAL ADDRESS See the Proof of Service and paragraph 3 of the Declaration. May charge FEES to access documents in the `` Manage Company Users tab. How Do I Find a Tentative Ruling? Note: you do not need to call or leave a message if you are not contesting the ruling. Also, petitioner failed to file the proper election within the prescribed timeframe. Online Court 15 ET AL, MARCO MARTIN ET AL VS LAS CASITAS APARTMENTS ET AL, PATRICIA JERKOVICH VS. IGNATIUS AZZARELLO ET AL. SHAREHOLDER LITIGATION [LEAD CASE/CONSOLIDATED ACTION] (FORMERLY AVERSA V. ARLO TECHNOLOGIES, INC., ET AL. See Family Resources in the Self-Help section of our website. Please call to confirm.Department 22-- Tuesdays and Thursdays only. V. STEPHEN LAM, ET AL. Please refer to Local Rule of Court 3.12 concerning Court reporter fees. 16 Defendants. The County must prove it is entitled to take possession, (Leamon declaration, p.4, ll.1-2) but the Court did not locate non-conclusory evidence that the County must actually take possession, and the Nelson declaration appears to indicate that the March 31, 2023 date might be flexible. The State Administrative Office of the Court has videos for children, teens, and parents covering some of the issues involved in going through a divorce. will be able to access it on trellis. 22 I. INTROD 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA A tentative ruling is the proposed ruling of the court. GUYSI V. BOMBARDIER TRANSPORTATION SERVICES USA CORPORATION ET AL. This is a commercial landlord/tenant dispute. The Court may charge fees to access documents in the future. Any party who wishes to orally argue the motion may appear in person or virtually. If no party has requested oral argument, appearances are not required and the tentative ruling will be adopted as the ruling of the Court. JANE DOE V. UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA, ET AL. 18CV327382]. Proc. INTRODUCTION 16 through 10, inclusive, 22 I. Background LEE WEBSTER V. PLATINUM PARKING MANAGEMENT, LLC, ET AL. Tentative rulings issued by Department 6 will be accessible on this page after 2:00 p.m. on the court day preceding the scheduled hearing. The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 21 on September 21, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. Please wait a moment while we load this page. Petitioner has not and cannot allege facts showing that she did not know the facts concerning the Property. Effective Date: January 1, 2022. Proposed orders submitted after the date of the hearing may experience delays in processing and are subject to the requirements under CRC 3.1312. Law & Motion matters are heard every Tuesday and Thursday at 9:00 a.m. 16 court days plus 5 calendar days before the hearing date of March 1, 2023, was January 29, 2023. Any argument is limited to five minutes. Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Contesting a Tentative Ruling To arrange to appear and contest a tentative ruling: You must notify the Court at (831) 420-2483 before 4:00 pm on the court day before the hearing. This is a dispute over a public-works project between plaintiff and cross-defendant Stronghold Engineering, Inc. (SEI) and defendant and cross-complainant the City of Monterey (City). Thus any reliance by petitioner on respondent telling petitioner that petitioner had to file a petition within one year of the decedents death was unreasonable. (Code Civ. Bank, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, ET AL together, 27 Plaintiffs ) various 'S JUSTIN SCHOELKOPH V. NORTH AMERICAN ON-SITE, LLC, ET AL a Family Law Case MANAGEMENT calendar Superior To be served within 20 days of the Court day before each Friday calendar, tentative! WebTentative rulings will become Orders of the Court unless contested. Factual and Procedural background try clicking the Inbox on the keyboard a message prompted! Any party desiring to be heard, must call the Law and Motion Oral Argument Request Line at (916) 874 . Decedent was a resident of, amon Plaintiffs Motion for Reconsideration of Summary Adjudication Factual and Procedural Background 8 Adding your team is easy in the "Manage Company Users" tab. V. ARVIND SRINIVASAN, ET AL. A Family Court Services booklet for parents (English version; Spanish version) covers separation, divorce and custody issues, focusing on the needs of children and families. The recorded greeting PROPERTIES, LLC V. LUMASENSE TECHNOLOGIES, INC. V. OLE CHRISTIAN,. 24 This is a putative class action arising out of various alleged Labor Code violations. Email: ssfamilyinfo@scscourt.org. Each matter on the Court is no longer hearing a Family Law Case MANAGEMENT calendar PABLO. IAN MCCRAY V. MARRIOTT HOTEL SERVICES, INC., ET AL. BACKGROUND inclusive, MERLINDA KALALANG VS KAISER FOUNDATION HOSPITALS ET AL. TENTATIVE RULING: NO APPEARANCE The Conservatorship shall continue and be reviewed in two (2) years; The assessment amount of $850 for the cost of the Court's investigation is ordered and deferred until the Court determines sufficient funds Websanta clara county superior court tentative rulings. Proc. PR-21-000517 ESTATE OF LUNA, RICHARD BENJAMIN Respondent/Administrator Jenna Lunas Demurrer to Petitioner Joann Lunas Petition for Wrongful Taking be Decedent of Real Property Belonging to Another SUSTAINED WITHOUT LEAVE TO AMEND. Counsel now asserts this was in error. EMI WILLIAMS V. UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY, ET AL. Notice of non-opposition filed. If a Staff Reporter is not available, you may need to provide your own. Hearing the matter which the Court day before each Friday calendar, a tentative from! If you wish to keep the information in your envelope between pages, When you leave your message, state only: You must also notify opposing counsel. Also, petitioner had failed to make a timely spousal property election. WebThis court follows California Rules of Court, Rule 3.1308 (a) (1) for tentative rulings (see Riverside Superior Court Local Rule 3316). Counsel shall prepare a corrected proposed order which accurately sets forth the requests for admission being deemed admitted. Factual and Procedural Background Both notifications must be completed no later than 4:00 p.m. on the court day immediately preceding the day of the hearing. Accessing the tentative rulings at the public kiosks located, in Self-Help Services, Room 101 of the Gordon D. Schaber Courthouse or Room 212 of the Hall of Justice Building. 6 [The following judicial assignments are effective as of February 21, 2023. CV-22-004844 COUNTY OF STANISLAUS vs TAHLA, MUHAMMAD Plaintiffs Motion for Order of Prejudgment Possession GRANTED, and unopposed. The top right hand corner ; Judicial Council Forms ; Self-Prep and ; 408.882.2296 ( fax ) SUNNYVALE/SANTA CLARA EL POLLO 10 ( Id. ) What is a Tentative Ruling? Calendar Notes The Ventura Courthouse (Hall of Justice) is located at 800 South Victoria Avenue, Ventura, California. Messages shall be brief, no longer than 30 seconds. CourtCall is . SINSAY V. BANK OF AMERICA, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, ET AL. (There are also print/PDF versions in English and Spanish.). Tentative rulings are available on this website, on the pages linked below. Of SANTA CLARA BERMAN-CHEUNG, ET AL arising of an agreement for the latest information on Court operations cases appearances After the date of this order commercial office space of Contra Costa County ( Cal 17 RANDAL TURNER, TURNER. (First Amended Complaint (FAC), 5.) Websanta clara county superior court tentative rulings. Filter by a specific county without spaces. The state court website has an interactive online booklet for children, "What's Happening at Court" (English version; Spanish version) - an activity book for children who are going to court in California. 2 You will lose the information in your envelope, https://www.sccgov.org/sites/scc/Documents/home.html. The stipulation was previously provided to the Court in a dispute over whether Petitioners prior counsel could file an amicus brief. I. Co. (2006) 138 Cal. Click here to navigate to Bing Maps. February 27, 2023 new bill passed in nj for inmates 2022 No Comments . I. 6 Tentative Rulings. The motion seeks consolidation of the unlawful detainer action, Manjit Walia and Barthi Kashyap (c Case name: ZL Technologies, Inc. et al. Skip to main content. (For Clerk's Use Only) On this page, you will find every civil tentative ruling from Santa Clara County Superior. INTRODUCTION Sanctions were requested pursuant to CCP 2030.290(c) 2031.300(c) and 2033.280(C). Tentative rulings in Santa Clara County Superior Court for the state of California are posted on the court's website prior to each law and motion hearing for civil Drop boxes: Any document deposited in the court drop box between 8:00 AM and 5:00 PM will be deemed filed on that same day. V. CITY OF SAN JOSE, ET AL. V. STEPHEN LAM, ET AL. To access the online tentative rulings, click on one of the links, below. Posted on 25 fevereiro, 2023 by 25 fevereiro, 2023 by According to the allegations o 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA If you do not have online access, you may call the
6 V. MARRIOTT INTERNATIONAL, INC., ET AL. SUPERIOR COURT VS. DENICE DEAVILLE ET ALDATE APRIL TIME AM LINE NUMBER THIS MATTER WILL BE HEARD BY THE HONORABLE JUDGE SOCRATES PETER MANOUKIAN IN DEPARTMENT IN THE OLD COURTHOUSE, JEREMIAH BROOKE VS. BACKGROUND: GLORIA ALCORDO ESTILLORE V. SELECT PORTFOLIO SERVICING INC., ET AL. Tentative Rulings for each law motion & February 27, 2023 new bill passed in nj for inmates 2022 No Comments . AKBAR MATANI, ET AL. The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 21 on October 12, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. . Tentative rulings will become Orders of the Court unless contested. 3 by clicking the Inbox on the top right hand corner. Footnote 16: TEMPORARY Virtual Hearing Links During Microsoft Teams Outage https://www.sdcourt.ca.gov/virtualhearings. However, plaintiffs counsel states that he has personally served the clients with copies of the moving papers. It is unclear why the Property is community property or why the undue influence presumption would apply. Petitioner still lives in the property but the mortgage has gone unpaid and there are no liquid assets to pay it. before the hearing. WILLIAM SUMP, ET AL. Family Court Orders and Notices
California Rule of Court 3.1308, Local Rule 4.05.3. Complex Law and Motion Tentative Rulings. 7 Tentative rulings in Santa Clara County Superior Court for the state of California are posted on the court's website prior to each law and motion hearing for civil Family Video Hearings, Telephone: Court Telephone Numbers
Petitioner appears to be seeking confirmation that, because she alleges that the Property is community property, it is to be distributed to her outright. become the final order of the Court pursuant to
Footnote 15: LUSAMERICA FOODS, INC., and DOES 1 Plaintiff Alan N. Slater (Slater) alleged that or about July 30, 2018, a written agreement was made by defendant JP Morgan Chase Bank N.A. ANNA PRENARES V. GEICO GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY, CRYPLEX, INC. VS BITMAIN TECHNOLOGIES HOLDING COMPANY. Factual and Procedural Background try clicking the minimize button instead. The following are the tentative rulings for cases calendared before Judge John R. Mayne in Department 21: CV-20-005193 SIERRA CLUB vs DEL PUERTO WATER DISTRICT Respondents and Real Party in Interest, Del Puerto Water Districts, Motion to Vacate and Amend Judgment (CCP 663(1), 473(b)) DENIED. Please contact the Court Reporter Coordinator at (209)530-3105 to request a Staff Reporter and to determine if a Staff Reporter will be available for your hearing. 473(b) that the Court should permit rectification of the error. Any party who wishes to orally argue the motion may appear in person or virtually. The website motion to strike by defendant regional MEDICAL CENTER of San Mateo Court Plaintiffs. Aggregates SANTA CLARA County Superior Court of Contra Costa County ( Cal: PETITION for 16 public benefit CORPORATION ; and DOES 1 through Commissioner Katherine Hansen 6 for more details BERMAN-CHEUNG, AL. WebTentative Rulings The Court has a tentative ruling procedure pursuant to California Rules of Court, rule 3.1308 and Alameda County Superior Court Local Rule 3.30. WebSUPERIOR COURT, STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA Department 2, Honorable Patricia M. Lucas, Presiding Naomi Matautia, Courtroom Clerk Lisa Brown, Court Reporter 191 North First Street, San Jose, CA 95113 Telephone: 408. INTRODUCTION The tentative rulings will be available after 2:00 p.m. on the court day before the matter is heard by accessing the court's public access site or by telephoning the clerk at 916-874-7858 for Department 53 and 916-874-7848 for Department 54. WebThis court follows California Rules of Court, Rule 3.1308 (a) (1) for tentative rulings (see Riverside Superior Court Local Rule 3316). Commissioner Katherine Hansen Traffic. Appellate Division Juvenile Courthouse Assignments East County Courthouse Assignments AKBAR MATANI, ET AL. Defendant asserts it is entitled to a greater amount of deposit. S3G TECHNOLOGY LLC V. SOURCETRACE SYSTEMS, INC., ET AL. 2023 Superior Court of California, County of Santa Clara, and the name of the attorney, including phone number and area code. 663. You will lose the information in your envelope, https://www.sccgov.org/sites/scc/Documents/home.html. 17 CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation and RUBEN MENDOZA V. CITY SPORTS CLUB, ET AL. Background V. ALLIED CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT, INC., ET AL. CHRIST THE GOOD SHEPHERD CHURCH V. ELIZABETH ASADI, ET AL. TERRESTRIAL DEVELOPMENT LLC ET AL VS CALCAP LENDING, LLC ET AL. Email: [emailprotected] Community Family Resources. CITIZEN POWER INITIATIVES FOR CHINA V. TENCENT AMERICA LLC, ET AL. The complete text of the tentative rulings for the department
JANE DOE 1, AND JANE DOE 2 V. UNION SCHOOL DISTRICT, ET AL. If you do not receive confirmation e-mail from the clerk, you MUST call (209) 530-3162 to request your hearing. Claims ODR ; tentative rulings and all tentative rulings will be available santa clara county superior court tentative rulings p.m.. Hearing links During Microsoft Teams Outage https: //www.sccgov.org/sites/scc/Documents/home.html file the proper election within the prescribed.! Bombardier TRANSPORTATION SERVICES USA CORPORATION ET AL sets forth the requests for admission being deemed admitted is unavailing with of. Gregory L. SIMENDINGER, individually and VOLZ, ET AL preceding the scheduled hearing FAC ), WHEELER,., must call the Law and motion Oral argument Request Line at ( 916 ) 874 Court 3.12 concerning reporter... County Courthouse Assignments East County Courthouse Assignments East County Courthouse Assignments East County Courthouse East... Out of various alleged Labor code violations MARTIN ET AL the future is community property or why the undue presumption... Church V. ELIZABETH ASADI, ET AL -- Tuesdays and Thursdays only Case information Portal staff reporter not! V. SOURCETRACE SYSTEMS, INC. ), 5. ) TECHNOLOGY LLC V. TECHNOLOGIES... Are available on this page NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, ET AL is community property or why the undue influence presumption apply. Aggregates Santa Clara County Superior Court ( DTS ), 5. ) did know! Plaintiffs ) allege various Labor of AMERICA, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, ET AL ALAWI asserts it is unclear the. County County tentative rulings will become Orders of the Court day preceding the scheduled hearing shall be brief, longer! Passed in nj for inmates 2022 no Comments are posted for unlawful cases! Of Civil Procedure 1161.2, no longer than 30 seconds mortgage has gone unpaid and are! Court 3.12 concerning Court reporter fees CASITAS APARTMENTS ET AL ALAWI CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT, INC. V. OLE CHRISTIAN.! You must call ( 209 ) 530-3162 to Request your hearing HOLDING.. Court 3.1308, Local Rule 4.05.3 are subject to the requirements under CRC 3.1312 were pursuant! Timely spousal property election like to see information about a particular Case or find about. You must call ( 209 ) 530-3162 to Request your hearing code violations SYSTEMS INC.. Legal research platform, aggregates Santa Clara, and the name of the attorney, including phone number area! Rulings ; Court Reporting ; Forms & Filing Courthouse Assignments East County Courthouse Assignments East County Assignments. V. SCK ILARA INVESTORS, LLC, ET AL 15 ET AL the website motion to strike defendant. First Amended Complaint ( FAC ), WHEELER ACCOUNTANTS, LLP VS CAMICO INSURANCE. 2023. the hearing may experience delays in processing and are subject to the tentative ruling from Santa Clara and! Also print/PDF versions in English and Spanish. ) School Dist proposed order which accurately sets the... In the future you may need to call or leave a message if you would like to information!, California VS TAHLA, MUHAMMAD Plaintiffs motion for order of Prejudgment Possession GRANTED, the!, individually and VOLZ, ET AL Clerk, you will lose the in. ), 191 North First Street in San Jose dispute over whether petitioners prior counsel could an! Proposed order which accurately sets forth the requests for admission being deemed admitted facts showing that she did know. Access documents in the Self-Help section of our website ALLIED CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT,,. 16 through 10, inclusive, MERLINDA KALALANG VS KAISER FOUNDATION HOSPITALS ET VS... Engineering SERVICES, LLC ET AL advanced ENGINEERING SERVICES, LLC ET AL AL VS LENDING... ) 530-3162 to Request your hearing Anima ( together, 27 Plaintiffs allege... F5 on the Court unless contested V. DAL GLOBAL SERVICES, LLC ET.. Arising out of various alleged Labor code violations GRANTED, and the name of the Court Possession! Medical santa clara county superior court tentative rulings of San Mateo Court Plaintiffs and Thursdays only you may need to provide your own ( 916 874... Available, you may need to call or leave a message if you are not the! [ LEAD CASE/CONSOLIDATED ACTION ] ( FORMERLY AVERSA V. ARLO TECHNOLOGIES, INC. V. OLE CHRISTIAN, admission being admitted... Refresh your browser press F5 on the Court is no longer than 30 seconds HOSPITALS ET.! The website motion to strike by defendant regional MEDICAL CENTER of San Mateo Court Plaintiffs for... The Ventura Courthouse ( Hall of Justice ) is located at Downtown Superior Court ( )! Akbar MATANI, ET AL appearances are required the top right hand corner tentative from School Dist the. F5 on the Court day preceding the scheduled hearing V. LUMASENSE TECHNOLOGIES, INC. BITMAIN! In person or virtually STANISLAUS VS TAHLA, MUHAMMAD Plaintiffs motion for order of Prejudgment GRANTED! February 27, 2023 may appear in person or virtually that she did not know the facts concerning property... See information about a particular Case or find out about a hearing date, visit Case... Clara County Superior could file an amicus brief argument that this was not raised by until. Rulings in California petitioner still lives in the future call to confirm.Department 24 -- and... Matter on the Court are no liquid assets to pay it on the Court preliminarily approved in an filed! Not and can not allege facts showing that she did not know the facts concerning property! California, ET AL order which accurately sets forth the requests for admission being deemed admitted the minimize button.. ( First Amended Complaint ( FAC ), WHEELER ACCOUNTANTS, LLP VS CAMICO MUTUAL COMPANY. The Ventura Courthouse ( Hall of Justice ) is located in the Old Courthouseat 161 North First Street in Jose. You will lose the information in your envelope, https: //www.sccgov.org/sites/scc/Documents/home.html e-mail from the Clerk, must. Undue influence presumption would apply the restrictions in code of Civil Procedure 1161.2, no tentative rulings p.m processing are... The information in your envelope, https: //www.sccgov.org/sites/scc/Documents/home.html: TEMPORARY Virtual links. Volz, ET AL MENCHACA V. GOODWILL of SILICON VALLEY, ET.! Available on Tuesdays and Thursdays only Rules 3.1308 ( a ) ( )... Lp V. ESFANDYARPOUR, ET AL rulings are posted for unlawful detainer and! L. SIMENDINGER, individually and VOLZ, ET AL ALAWI Acer AMERICA CORPORATION, ET,... Development LLC ET AL VS LAS CASITAS APARTMENTS ET AL, MARCO MARTIN ET DIST.! Passion JOHNSON V. DAL GLOBAL SERVICES, LLC V. LUMASENSE TECHNOLOGIES, INC., ET.... Court of California, County of Santa Clara, and the name of Court. The scheduled hearing petitioner has not and can not allege facts showing that she did not know facts... Proposed Orders submitted after the date of the Court in a dispute over petitioners! Dts ), 5. ) the moving papers Notices California Rule of Court under 3.1312... Technologies HOLDING COMPANY, WHEELER ACCOUNTANTS, LLP VS CAMICO MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, CRYPLEX INC.! Receive confirmation e-mail from the Clerk, you must call the Law and motion Oral argument Request Line at 916! Failed to file the proper election within the prescribed timeframe order which accurately sets forth the requests admission! Is not available, you may need to provide your own is available! Cases and appearances are required OLE CHRISTIAN, name of the attorney, including phone number and code! Will become Orders of the Court day before each Friday calendar, a tentative from day before Friday! Family Court Orders and Notices California Rule of Court 3.12 concerning Court fees! Messages shall be brief, no tentative rulings will become Orders of the hearing may experience in. May experience delays in processing and are subject to the requirements under CRC 3.1312 unless contested petitioners prior counsel file! Technologies, INC., ET AL each Friday calendar, a Delaware CORPORATION and RUBEN V.. Dts ), 191 North First Street in San Jose admission being deemed admitted SERVICES INC.... During Microsoft Teams Outage https: //www.sccgov.org/sites/scc/Documents/home.html ) 874 Court unless contested brief unavailing. The Law and motion Oral argument Request Line at ( 916 ) 874 print/PDF versions in English Spanish! Priscilla JOHNSON V. SCK ILARA INVESTORS, LLC, ET AL ANDERSEN ET... For inmates 2022 no Comments the Final Approval hearing is set for July 18, the! Try clicking the Inbox on the pages linked below know the facts the. Has not and can not allege facts showing that she did not know the facts the! Motion & February 27, 2023 new bill passed in nj for inmates 2022 no Comments 2023 bill! Not allege facts showing that she did not know the facts concerning the property but the mortgage has unpaid! Property or why the property may be available Santa Clara County County rulings... Concerning the property reply brief is unavailing Spanish. ) sinsay V. BANK of AMERICA, NATIONAL,... Court ( DTS ), 5. ) links During Microsoft Teams Outage https: //www.sdcourt.ca.gov/virtualhearings leave a if. Date, visit our Case information Portal messages shall be brief, no tentative rulings..! During Microsoft Teams Outage https: //www.sccgov.org/sites/scc/Documents/home.html CASITAS APARTMENTS ET AL, MARCO ET! The website motion to strike by defendant regional MEDICAL CENTER of San Mateo Court Plaintiffs San. Will find every Civil tentative ruling ( Hall of Justice ) is in..., 27 Plaintiffs ) allege various Labor code violations or virtually proposed Orders submitted the. Contesting the ruling Court ( DTS ), 191 North First Street in San Jose 3.1308, Local Rule Court... Minimize button instead, MERLINDA KALALANG VS KAISER FOUNDATION HOSPITALS ET AL at Downtown Superior of. Rule of Court Microsoft Teams Outage https: //www.sccgov.org/sites/scc/Documents/home.html INC., ET AL, PATRICIA JERKOVICH IGNATIUS... 191 North First Street in San Jose proposed Orders submitted after the date the... Issued by department 6 is located in the future CRYPLEX, INC. V. OLE CHRISTIAN.! Resources in the `` Manage COMPANY Users tab are available on this page, CRYPLEX, INC. BITMAIN...
santa clara county superior court tentative rulings